Here is an article with a suggested solution to the Metamask issue:
Title: Metamask address not being read from function call interface
Introduction :
As the popularity of decentralized finance (DeFi) and non-fungible tokens (NFTs) continues to grow, many users are exploring the possibilities offered by Metamask, a popular Ethereum wallet. However, a common issue that can arise when interacting with Metamask is that the metamask address behaves strangely during function calls.
Problem :
When calling a function in the front-end that asks users to log in to their Metamask and read the account address, some developers have reported encountering unexpected behavior where the address returned by the “accounts” variable does not match the expected value. This issue can be caused by a variety of factors, including:
- Malformed Ethereum request
- Inconsistent network conditions (e.g. slow or unstable connection)
- Metamask wallet issues (e.g. corrupted storage or incorrect settings)
Solution:
To resolve this issue, you can try the following steps:
Step 1: Check and optimize Ethereum request
Make sure that the Ethereum request is formatted properly. Here is an example:
const accounts = await window.ethereum.request({
method: 'signing',
parameters: {
account,
beg,
},
});
Replace ‘account’, ‘provider’, and ‘signing’ with the actual values required by your function.
Step 2: Check network conditions
Make sure that the network conditions are stable. Try a simple operation or query to verify that Metamask is connecting properly:
console.log(window.ethereum.selectedAccount);
If this line returns an empty array, it may indicate slow or unstable connections. You may need to try a different connection method or wait a short while.
Step 3: Check for Metamask wallet issues
If you are experiencing persistent issues, make sure that your Metamask wallet is working properly. Try:
- Refresh your wallet by calling
window.ethereum.refresh()
- Verify that the storage is not corrupted by running
window.ethereum.storage.clear()
, then refresh your wallet
- Restart Metamask to make sure it is loaded properly
Step 4: Test with different function calls
Try calling different functions in your interface to see if the issue is specific to a particular function call. This can help determine if the issue is with your code implementation or configuration.
Conclusion:
By following these steps, you should be able to resolve the strange behavior of getting a Metamask address in a function call. If you are still having issues, feel free to provide more information about your setup and code, and I will do my best to help you resolve the issue!