Here is an article based on its specifications:
Metamask: Call Return JS JS be ignored in the payment of Metamsk’s payment: If multiple charges in emergency
When you pay through metamask, the situation can arise when there are several unpaid charges. The problem is that in this case, when one of the transactions is confirmed, the call return is ignored.
The problem arises because Metamk’s “function” processes several payment requests and then removes it after the event has been resolved. However, it does not indicate the call function of JavaScript (in this case ‘OnComplete’) for successful payments made in the fees made in this way. function.
This can lead to confusion for users who are trying to strengthen their events or return lost funds. In such cases, it may not be immediately clear why some payments were confirmed, while others are not.
To avoid this problem, developers should consider using alternative methods, such as web3.js or ethhers.js, which provide a more solid and reliable way to manage Metamk events. These libraries often include included activities to process multiple payment requests and notifications for successful payments for the call return function JS.
It is also worth noting that some browsers may have different behavior in terms of charges. For example, Chrome’s oldest versions may continue to indicate the announcement after the event has been confirmed, even if the call return has not been stated. This can make users understand why their events are being handled.
To solve and ensure the problems of this problem, your metamask -based application works properly, developers must monitor the error or warning related to the processing of their records and their browser console. They may also consider implementing additional checks or invoice mechanisms if the fees are not confirmed by JS of the call return function.
By understanding the limitations of the payment function and taking action around, developers can build more solid and reliable applications that meet the needs of their users.